Keep knowledgeable with free updates
Merely signal as much as the Pensions business myFT Digest — delivered on to your inbox.
The federal government is pushing forward with a controversial proposal to increase the function of the UK’s pension lifeboat fund because it seems for tactics to unlock billions of kilos of retirement fund capital to spice up financial development.
Jeremy Hunt, chancellor, is predicted to announce a session on a widened function for the Pension Safety Fund (PPF), in his Autumn Assertion subsequent week.
The transfer is predicted to be a part of a wider vary of measures designed to encourage pension fund funding in so-called “productive finance” or areas that may assist increase financial development.
The £33bn PPF was established in 2005 to rescue outlined profit pension plans within the occasion of the sponsoring employer collapsing and to make sure members proceed to obtain retirement advantages.
Underneath Hunt’s proposals, the fund would tackle a further function as a consolidator of smaller DB schemes connected to wholesome firms.
The PPF, which is partly funded by means of an business levy, manages £33bn in property and its dimension offers it extra funding flexibility in comparison with many company DB schemes.
In a name for proof earlier this yr, the federal government mentioned the expanded function of the PPF would “drive scale, enabling a extra subtle and productive long-term funding strategy”.
Nevertheless, the proposals have sparked issues that the broader remit for the PPF would create a state-backed competitor to insurers, that are focusing on a whole lot of billions of kilos of pension property by way of buyouts of company schemes over the subsequent decade.
Yvonne Braun, director of coverage for long-term financial savings on the Affiliation of British Insurers, mentioned: “Such a transfer could be a market-shifting intervention in a buyout market that’s not solely working, it’s thriving.”
“It’s well-regulated, well-funded, well-functioning and displaying no proof of market failure,” she mentioned. “Any enlargement would additionally danger introducing ethical hazard into DB scheme decision-making.”
Braun mentioned employers may really feel inclined to place much less cash into their scheme to get cheaper safety from a public consolidator, relatively than looking for full safety by way of an insurer buyout.
“Questions round who would choose up the invoice if the PPF needed to pay full advantages to members the place schemes fall into deficit would additionally must be answered. Would the federal government have the urge for food to tackle this legal responsibility?”
Nigel Peaple, director of coverage and advocacy with the Pensions and Lifetime Financial savings Affiliation, mentioned past encouraging the buyout market the federal government would do higher different non-public sector options, comparable to placing industrial DB superfunds, which already act as consolidators, on a statutory foundation. “We don’t consider the federal government must arrange a public sector consolidator,” he added.
One insurance coverage government mentioned the emergence of a “state-sponsored” competitor may undermine insurers who had constructed enterprise fashions predicated on a wave of company pension offers.
One other government mentioned any transfer that “blew up” the buyout market would put in danger earlier pledges from insurers to speculate £100bn in infrastructure and different long-term property.
Hunt can be anticipated to unveil new tax incentives to encourage employers with well-funded DB schemes to proceed working their retirement plans relatively than paying an insurer to take over the liabilities.
This proposal goals to ease employer entry to any pension scheme surplus and encourage company pension plans to again long-term investments to assist increase the financial system.